At the Intersection of Spatial Data and Phenomenology in Pompeii
This 2-day online conference will pull together leading research teams and scholars to assess the emergent world of Pompeii at the intersection of spatial data, digital methods, sensory experience, and embodied phenomenology.
Over the past decade, our understanding of Pompeii has evolved significantly through methodologies that approach it as a “city of data” on the one hand, and the exploration of sensory experience and phenomenology on the other. Data-first methodologies are changing what we think about space and its relation to decoration in Pompeii, and at the same time experience-based methodologies are raising new questions about perception, behavior, and emotions in these spaces. While attempts to reconstruct the sensory experience of Pompeii have a variety of “ways in” - some digital, some not - together these efforts aim to tease out the holistic impact of this very densely textured environment. We are approaching a point where sensory, cognitive , and emotional impacts can begin to be compared with patterns in the spatial data.
Attendance is free, but please register in advance for this meeting. After registering, you will receive a confirmation email containing information about joining the meeting.
Please contact Rachel Murray (rcm003@uark.edu) for more information.
Friday, July 23rd
CDT: 8:00 - 8:30
(GMT: 13:00 - 13:30)
Welcome
Remarks by organizers
CDT: 8:30 - 9:30
(GMT: 13:30 - 14:30)
Keynote Speaker
Bettina Bergmann (Mount Holyoke College): Reflecting on Reconstruction
Why reconstruct? Focussing on examples from the 19th century to the present, I consider the motivations and methods for recreating the ancient spaces of Pompeii and how these visualizations express contemporary beliefs and aspirations.
CDT: 9:30 - 11:00
(GMT: 14:30 - 16:00)
Session 1: Domestic Space I
David Fredrick (University of Arkansas): If Space Could Talk: Network Typology and Heterogeneous Power in Pompeian Houses
A network analysis of space in Pompeian houses does not support the interpretation of a structure that functions primarily to articulate and display the centralized power of a dominus. Rather, it suggests the flow of information from and through multiple significant nodes and pathways. A give-and-take, heterogeneous flow of information is consistent with the literary representation of households from the late Republic through the early Empire, and frequently reflected the houses themselves through erotic imagery of ambiguity and reversal.
Anne-Marie Leander Touati (Lund University): The Idea of The Pompeian House Modified by Remote Study of Insula V 1 (Preliminary)
Danilo Marco Campanaro (Lund University): What's New under The Roof? Revisiting the Pompeian House in a New Light (Preliminary)
CDT: 11:00 - 12:30
(GMT: 16:00 - 17:30)
Lunch/Coffee Break
CDT: 12:30 - 2:00
(GMT:17:30 - 19:00)
Session 2: Spatial Studies
Eric Poehler (University of Massachusetts, Amherst): Naming The Walls: Pompeii's "Atomic" Spatial Resolution
This talk will address the work of the Pompeii Artistic Landscape Project (PALP) to increase the spatial resolution of Pompeii from the individual building down to a specific wall within an individual room. PALP's purpose in telescoping down to the individual wall is (at least) twofold: 1.) to offer the ability to conduct particularly fine-grained geospatial analysis and 2.) to provide a unique spatial entity (and stable identifier) that can serve as the attachment point for the information about the artwork executed on that wall. This talk will discuss our work to reach this 'atomic' level of description of Pompeii's spatial representation, addressing both the technical and administrative challenges. In the former category are issues relating to original data quality and the limits of GIS technologies, while the latter category addresses questions of data ownership and personnel management (i.e., dozens of undergraduate students over many years). The talk will conclude with a brief demonstration PALP's current tools and implementation as well as a some hints at its future evolution.
Eeva-Maria Viitanen (Independent): Mapping Pompeians and Their Pompeiis: A Reconsideration of Locations of Textual Evidence
Pompeii affords a unique range of textual evidence which can be placed in context: stone inscriptions, painted and scratched wall writings, texts on all kinds of artifacts. Most of these include names of people and catalogues of Pompeians have been created over time. The spatial relationships between the persons and the find locations have been implicitly formulated and the most common interpretation has been that of inhabitants and/or owners of houses. The data have been used to create a sort of a postal directory of Pompeians – most notably by Matteo Della Corte’s Case ed abitanti di Pompei (1965). Since Della Corte, the data related to houses has not been studied although his methods and interpretations have been heavily criticized. Studying the contexts of electoral notices has led me to re-examine both the different types of evidence and the data sets from individual houses. These analyses show that the simple, stationary relationship of inhabitant/owner between places and individuals is usually very difficult to establish. If an individual can be identified more than once, they are often found in different places, not clustered in one house. Elite houses commonly contain many different kinds of evidence with dozens of individuals and several family names – how can the inhabitants/owners be identified from the casual visitors? The distributions of names map the places to which the individuals and families had some kind of a relationship, which could be living, work, leisure or something else. The data can be used to explore the spatial relationships of Pompeians: where they visited, where they had access to, how they might have perceived their city, and sometimes even where they lived.
Matt Notarian (Hiram College): Fountains, Neighborhoods, and Movement: A Dynamic Spatial Network Model of Water Fetching in Pompeii
The transport of water from public street fountains to living and working spaces in Pompeii has never been systematically studied, despite superb preservation that allows for street-by-street, unit-level detail. Fetching water was routine but arduous labor likely done by enslaved and female populations. As often noted, fountains were nodes of social interaction that defined natural neighborhoods. As part of an ongoing project exploring water fetching in Pompeii, I have developed an anisotropic spatial network model that links all 2000+ doorways in the city to its 43 public fountains. This model refines previous qualitative hypotheses by generating more nuanced overlapping districts that are quantified by unit count, size, function, time and energy, and aggregate pedestrian traffic. The results reconstruct the scale of labor of marginalized sectors of Roman society, and could offer quantifiable points of comparison to other Roman cities and contemporary worldwide water provision.
CDT 2:00 - 3:00
(GMT: 19:00 - 20:00)
Round Table Discussion/Happy Hour
Moderated by organizers
Saturday, July 24th
CDT: 9:00 - 9:30
(GMT: 14:00 - 14:30)
Welcome Back
Remarks by organizers
CDT: 9:30 - 11:00
(GMT: 14:30 - 16:00)
Session 3: Domestic Space II
Cindy Roullet (University of Arkansas): PPMExplorer: Search, Find, and Explore Pompeian Art
In Pompei: Pitture e Mosaici (PPM), there are about 20,000 images from Pompeii that have been annotated and accompanied by historical information. With the help of computer vision, we extracted and digitized the data. Our team also developed PPMExplorer (PPMx), a software tool. The PPMx software was developed to assist in exploring the extracted data. The PPMExplorer tool aids archeologists in investigating historical discoveries and testing hypotheses. This presentation will introduce PPMExplorer and how to use it. In addition, you will learn about the interconnection technology that will allow you to explore Pompeii and use PPM records in a new way.
Amanda K. Chen (University of Maryland): Movement and Repetition in the Decorative Program of the Casa di
Paquius Proculus [I.7.1]
In recent decades, scholars of Roman art and archaeology have recognized the programmatic and context-specific nature of domestic decoration, especially large, single-room, mythological ensembles. Considering this important work, my paper will discuss the existence and function of non-mythological decorative programs on a structure-wide scale. I will investigate the diverse and well-preserved decorative elements that appear within the the Casa di Paquius Proculus [I.7.1] in Pompeii, many of which are repeated two or more times in different rooms the house, as a case study to better understand domestic programs and the phenomenology of domestic embellishment. By reconstructing the experience of moving through the Casa di Paquius Proculus and assessing the locations of the repeating motifs, I will demonstrate that visual dialogues created through the repetition of familiar decorative elements could work across different rooms to entertain guests and help structure movement throughout the house.
Annette Haug (CAU Kiel): The ECR Consolidator Grant DECOR: General Project Outline
The ERC Consolidator Grant “DECOR” deals with decorative principles in Late Republican and Early Imperial Italy. The talk will present the general outline of the project, refer to some theoretical reflexions and sketch some exemplary results. A case study will be presented by Taylor Lauritsen.
CDT: 11:00 - 12:30
(GMT: 16:00 - 17:00)
Lunch/Coffee Break
CDT: 12:30 - 2:00
(GMT: 17:30 - 19:00)
Session 4: Neighborhoods, Streets, & Shops
Taylor Lauritsen (CAU Kiel): Life at a Crossroads: Decoration and Design on the Via di Mercurio
In the years since it was excavated, Pompeii’s northwest quarter has been viewed as a rather old-fashioned neighbourhood that was home to the city’s most prominent inhabitants. The urban florescence of the 2nd c. BC was particularly influential for the architectural and decorative appearance of the area, especially along the Via di Mercurio, the broad thoroughfare around which the neighbourhood developed. At this time, the Mercurio was lined with grandiose houses of traditional Samnite design. But over the course of the next two centuries, the character of the street changed considerably, with bars, shops and workshops popping up along its route, especially near the junction with the Vicolo di Mercurio. After a brief survey of these developmental processes, this paper will consider the appearance of the streetscape in Pompeii’s final years from a first-person perspective. By examining the manner in which the Via di Mercurio’s evolution led to the production of new decorative forms, the paper will challenge conventional perceptions of both the street and neighbourhood.
Rhodora Vennarucci (University of Arkansas): You Touch It, You Buy It: Examining Multisensory Experience in a Pompeian Shop
Scholarship on Roman consumption practices remains focused on quantifiable, economic methods and the objects consumed, often in their end-use or discard contexts, as metrics for consumer behavior, largely overlooking the important point of purchase context within a shop environment when a buyer first decided to take ownership – or not – of a product. In pre-industrial societies, such as ancient Rome, a consumer’s sensorial appraisal of a shop and its goods was a critical factor influencing their decision-making processes. This presentation outlines Virtual Roman Retail (VRR) project’s sensory approach and use of digital technologies to reconstruct the sensescape of the Felt Shop of Verecundus (IX.7.5-7) at Pompeii in order to better understand the effect of shop design on consumer experience.
Laura Nissin (University of Helsinki): A Smellwalk around The Block: Studying the Smellscape of a Pompeian Neighborhood
Smells are made up of volatilized chemical compounds and our ability to notice odors results from the number of molecules available to our olfactory receptors. However, smelling is not only a physiological phenomenon but also a cultural and historical one, and without understanding the ancient sensory landscapes our knowledge of the past remains inevitably limited. Measuring smells is a complex and uncertain process even in the modern world, albeit different olfactometric tools have been developed in recent times and commercial smell detection and odor control services are readily available when needed. In the research into the past, these methods are obviously not available, which raises the question of how does one study such fleeting experiences?
Tracing the ephemeral sensory encounters from archaeological material is admittedly difficult. However, in recent Classical scholarship, different methods to investigate the past sensations have been developed, from the more traditional approaches that use either literary or archaeological evidence or these in combination to more experimental ones. The experimental methods include the phenomenological approach, which puts the researcher’s own bodily experience in the center of the investigation. Linked to this embodied approach is a technique called ‘smellwalking’, which emphasizes the movement in space while recording smells encountered during the walk.1
I this paper I explore the possibilities to study the olfactory nuisances in one Pompeian city block (IX,3) and its immediate neighbors. I examine the city stinks in the area, by tracing and mapping the sources of smells one could encounter walking around the block. The focus is on such stenches that have been considered in previous scholarship rendering ancient towns foul-smelling: ordure and other waste, industrial activities, as well as smoke.
The analysis of evidence contests the views of malodorousness of Roman/Campanian urban space presented in previous studies and suggests that the smellscape of the urban Pompeian air was not constantly reeking, but milder and manageable, only occasionally interrupted by puffs of smells reaching the nose of passersby. I also argue that the inhabitants of Pompeii paid close attention to olfactory nuisances and attempted to regulate their sources. However, the analysis also reveals that social hierarchies and power relations played part in Pompeian odor control. The spatial arrangements were designed to shield the noses of elite inhabitants from the most offensive smells, but much less consideration was paid to the olfactory experiences of poorer classes and slaves.
CDT: 2:00 - 3:00
(GMT: 19:30 - 20:00)
Farewell and Happy Hour